Asus PRIME H410M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H410M-E  (all builds)
Memory53.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 00:54
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$220
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 261
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 797
83% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,125
70% 1,125 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2405) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 140
Parallax 240
97% 166 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 126
Splatting 188
146% 179 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 54 3.3 65 41 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 481
Write 93.4
Mixed 175
SusWrite 37.2
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 39.8
127% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 15.9
47% 101 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
305GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 145 157 172 155 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 119
Write 72.5
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 162
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 28.7
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 165 24" 1280 720 GSM5C01 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical PRIME H410M-E Builds (Compare 4,608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback