MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 175%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 169%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory43.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 00:30
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 78.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 795
79% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,212
75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$595
Nvidia(10DE 18FE) ≥ 4GB; nvdia rtx 4070 founders
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 299
Parallax 312
240% 302 fps
MRender 445
Gravity 262
Splatting 209
238% 305 fps
Poor: 173%
This bench: 212%
Great: 235%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 406 405 362 350 361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 409
Mixed 267
SusWrite 371
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 37.1
142% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 325
250% 339 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
466GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 445 402 371 353 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 480
Mixed 402
SusWrite 387
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 48
164% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 290
236% 335 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 117%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
931GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 467 467 429 407 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 483
Mixed 417
SusWrite 429
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 26
129% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 265
218% 313 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 121%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
324GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 34 32 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 35.5
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 34.8
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
75% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMW32GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMW32GX4M2D3000C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.5% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 24.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 20 3 165 26.9" 2560 1377 DELD176 DELL G2724D
Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $686
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback