Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 21:06
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$118
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 157
2-Core 312
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 874
90% 728 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0N01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 509 544 180 204 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 968
Write 413
Mixed 533
SusWrite 376
127% 572 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 40.4
153% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 614
491% 695 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 141%
Great: 244%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
188GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 456 407 448 446 481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 481
Mixed 319
SusWrite 449
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 34.1
121% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 69.2
130% 259 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3733 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 37
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 36
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 25 60 0" 1280 720
Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback