Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190308
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '24 at 20:05
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 206 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 268 35% 262 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.9% Average	Lighting 54.9 Reflection 55 Parallax 47.7 45% 52.5 fps	MRender 41.8 Gravity 48.5 Splatting 43.2 36% 44.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SAMSUNG 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25E Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 365 Write 309 Mixed 244 68% 306 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 10.6 78% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 97.6 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 16.9 53% 111 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 54%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 277GB free Firmware: 1AJ10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 112 116 116 119 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 102 Write 134 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 115 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD 1x16GB 752 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 11.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.3 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	41	21	75	24"	1280 720	NVI2400 IP24V1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,077x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	934x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	279x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	356x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	298x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	232x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	301x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	132x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	159x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16