TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gbt___ GBTUACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
SystemGbt___ GBTUACPI  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.9 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '15 at 19:57
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 155
46% 107 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 460
45% 371 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1013.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 24
22% 24.4 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 27.9
20% 23.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 21.4%
 Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SAMSUNG 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.8% Below average
Read 382
Write 106
Mixed 181
48% 223 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 9.95
4K Mixed 7.14
46% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 9.79
DQ Mixed 6.85
7% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 35.8%
 Great: 54%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.11 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 194
Write 55.4
Mixed 77.6
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 10.4
83% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 56.7
DQ Mixed 9.39
16% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 36.8%
 Great: 51%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
774GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 131
Write 119
Mixed 115
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.74
4K Mixed 0.34
128% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 71.8%
 Great: 83%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
385GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 121
Mixed 117
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.95
4K Mixed 0.38
132% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 74.9%
 Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GBTUACPI Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ GBTUACPI

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples3x
Core2 6600Intel  $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples2x
Pentium D 3.00GHzIntel  $98Bench 30%, 4,281 samples2x
GPU
GeForce 7600 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 1,212 samples3x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples3x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples2x
SSD
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples4x
SP900 64GBAdataBench 55%, 416 samples1x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples1x
RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples8x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback