Adlink M-910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAdlink M-910  (all builds)
MotherboardADLINK M-910
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210907
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 19:25
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 434
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 8
5% 7.73 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 13
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 407 386 354 335 359 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 398
Write 435
Mixed 224
SusWrite 370
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 37.6
130% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 331
250% 335 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK1T0TBN 1TB
593GB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 446 376 367 370 356 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 466
Mixed 337
SusWrite 393
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 35.3
129% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 323
247% 334 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown X4G16QA8BVWEMO-7-AD1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.2% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 24.1" 1280 720 DELA02E DELL E248WFP
Typical M-910 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Adlink M-910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback