Lenovo 82FG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82FG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220402
Uptime7 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 18:07
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 255
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 466
57% 436 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F89) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 10
7% 9.33 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QFXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 178 167 169 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 975
Write 165
Mixed 304
SusWrite 169
88% 403 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 42.8
160% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 196
187% 300 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 114%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 33% 15 98 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 IVO061F
Typical 82FG Builds (Compare 2,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82FG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback