Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive394% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory121.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 14:52
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$464
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 243
2-Core 462
135% 263 Pts
4-Core 899
8-Core 1,660
153% 1,280 Pts
64-Core 3,699
229% 3,699 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$549
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 257
Parallax 271
216% 264 fps
MRender 345
Gravity 236
Splatting 185
201% 255 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 189%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
954GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1386 1234 1243 1246 1233 1233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2,738
Write 2,519
Mixed 1,921
SusWrite 1,262
472% 2,110 MB/s
4K Read 73
4K Write 262
4K Mixed 109
389% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 2,172
DQ Write 1,764
DQ Mixed 1,821
1,404% 1,919 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 394%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-32 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
162% Outstanding
MC Read 64.3
MC Write 61.7
MC Mixed 60.8
178% 62.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 51.9
SC Mixed 35.9
107% 37.5 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 162%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 27" 1280 720 DELA199 DELL S2721D
Typical TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 225%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 245%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $784
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback