HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

27 days ago, 27 days ago, 27 days ago, 18 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8390
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '24 at 05:35
Run Duration	97 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 183 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 403 45% 352 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q) 36,643 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8390) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1860 MHz, MLim: 2251 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	46.7% Average	Lighting 54.9 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 58.2 45% 59.6 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 57.5 Splatting 59 51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 48%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 19,561 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 940 Write 928 Mixed 817 200% 895 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 58 192% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 880 DQ Write 591 DQ Mixed 707 535% 726 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 170%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 102 Write 118 Mixed 28.2 60% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 2,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (80^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.3% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 22.4 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 23.2 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 61: 0P 6R 10G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
61%	15%	116	165	0	120	15.5"	1920 1080	CMN15F1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,381x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	970x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,354x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	791x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	782x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	295x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	275x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	159x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	310x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16