Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive522% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 03:05
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 902
88% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.3% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 59.1
Parallax 79.7
50% 66.8 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 43.2
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 48 50 51 50 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
522% Outstanding
Read 6,442
Write 44.6
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 47.7
344% 1,655 MB/s
4K Read 650
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 2.9
990% 218 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 522%
Great: 257%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
179GB free
Firmware: 32A0T2IA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 437 439 441 440 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,363
Write 998
Mixed 966
SusWrite 451
211% 944 MB/s
4K Read 63.9
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 81.7
277% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 476
429% 653 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 201%
Great: 257%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
754GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 155 155 154 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 163
Mixed 108
SusWrite 154
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 109%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB
449GB free, PID 8015
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 103
114% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 DEL415A DELL U2719D
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback