Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

30 days ago, 30 days ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR (all builds)
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '24 at 03:04
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$199 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 70.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 266 85% 158 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 907 86% 714 Pts	64-Core 1,112 69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 8671) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 121 Parallax 136 108% 130 fps	MRender 183 Gravity 131 Splatting 110 112% 141 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB 85,321 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: UJ220400 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 458 Write 382 Mixed 309 85% 383 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 15.4 77% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 84.1 DQ Mixed 32.1 41% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 355GB free Firmware: CC3E Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 78.3 Write 85.4 Mixed 59.4 56% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 16.7 Write 1.2 Mixed 4.2 7% 7.37 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB 317 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.1% Good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 27.1 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 26.3 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	57	75	34.1"	2560 1080	GSM76FA LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	158x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	149x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $194Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	114x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	112x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	66x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	53x

SSD
SPECTRIX S40G 512GBXPGBench 209%, 26,235 samples	31x
GAMMIX S41 1TBXPGBench 257%, 856 samples	21x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	19x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	37x
DDR4 3600 2x8GBAdataBench 95%, 15,812 samples	26x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBTeamBench 82%, 22,274 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $620

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16