HP Laptop 15-fd0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-fd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BB8
Memory0.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230703
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 01:28
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-N305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 48
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 156
49% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 628
56% 476 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8BB8) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 7.6
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.9%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02AN00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,207
Write 1,234
Mixed 933
251% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 42.8
138% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 516
372% 485 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 14.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 4.3
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 12% 58 76 43 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0B14
Typical Laptop 15-fd0xxx Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15-fd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback