Asus Vivobook Go E1504GAB_E1504GA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook Go E1504GAB_E1504GA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E1504GAB
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '23 at 17:37
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-N305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 22.4
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 154
39% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 643
58% 491 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 3178) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 8.4
6% 7.6 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 7.9
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 863 952 874 1076 1088 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,132
Write 859
Mixed 764
SusWrite 959
208% 929 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 57.3
166% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 401
325% 457 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 178%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.1
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 303
13% 303 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook Go E1504GAB_E1504GA Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook Go E1504GAB_E1504GA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback