Asus B85M-G

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-G (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '24 at 00:23
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$51 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 195 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 337 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78% Very good	Lighting 98.1 Reflection 105 Parallax 148 80% 117 fps	MRender 89.3 Gravity 111 Splatting 76.1 74% 92.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 25 23 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 362 Write 24.5 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 23.3 23% 110 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 13.9 41% 9.73 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 86GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 341 264 254 228 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 440 Write 414 Mixed 320 SusWrite 290 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 40.9 136% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 360 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.5% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.5 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.4 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 89.4 45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	65	48	60	23.5"	1280 720	AOC2461 2461W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	967x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	788x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	534x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	481x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	404x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	372x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	260x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	164x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	153x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	158x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	127x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16