Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1195G7 2,243 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 144 58% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 296 29% 236 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(1854 0459) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	7.58% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 9.8 6% 9.43 fps	MRender 15 Gravity 14.2 Splatting 9.7 10% 13 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.58% Great: 20%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB 21,294 User benchmarks, average bench 253% 814GB free (System drive) Firmware: 41000C20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 732 813 1242 1174 796 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 1,692 Write 1,135 Mixed 1,241 SusWrite 912 278% 1,245 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 58.1 185% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 246 180% 242 MB/s
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 338%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB 9,706 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 8 of 8 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 27.8 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 14.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	60	17"	1280 720	LGD0695

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-1195G7IntelBench 69%, 2,243 samples	11x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	11x

SSD
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBBench 253%, 21,294 samples	11x

RAM
UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GBSamsungBench 108%, 9,706 samples	11x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16