Lenovo 10A8S16X0J

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10A8S16X0J  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 19:00
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 189
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 554
56% 455 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T400
HP(103C 1489) 2GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.31
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 19.1
16% 13.1 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 22.2
12% 13.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S128G1001 128GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3551001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 467
Write 328
Mixed 193
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 32.5
111% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 185
155% 227 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 25 19 23 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 Kingston 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 3R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 47% 36 283 32 60 23.8" 1280 720 BNQ802F BenQ BL2480T
Typical 10A8S16X0J Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A8S16X0J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback