Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 277%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 373%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 132%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics216% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive566% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 16:18
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$499
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 249
2-Core 490
140% 274 Pts
4-Core 963
8-Core 1,879
168% 1,421 Pts
64-Core 4,472
277% 4,472 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 132%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E440) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 266
Parallax 559
227% 368 fps
MRender 445
Gravity 225
Splatting 358
280% 342 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 216%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
818GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3877 4460 4346 4349 1363 1712 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
566% Outstanding
Read 3,057
Write 4,409
Mixed 3,084
SusWrite 3351
787% 3,475 MB/s
4K Read 82.8
4K Write 363
4K Mixed 119
471% 188 MB/s
DQ Read 2356
DQ Write 1,967
DQ Mixed 2,158
1,618% 2,161 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 566%
Great: 595%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
271GB free
Firmware: X6107000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 288
Mixed 190
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 51.6
186% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 276
225% 321 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 121%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
100GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 422
Mixed 358
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 47.4
183% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 177
178% 289 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
182GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 370
Write 396
Mixed 366
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 46.7
167% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 228
171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
267GB free
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,908
Write 3,621
Mixed 2,530
745% 3353 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 98.1
337% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 2,277
DQ Write 1,786
DQ Mixed 2,032
1,520% 2,031 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 537%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
334GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,841
Write 3,207
Mixed 2,030
532% 2,359 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 321
4K Mixed 97
366% 155 MB/s
DQ Read 2,440
DQ Write 1,798
DQ Mixed 502
814% 1,580 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 6.5
11% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 2.9
128% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 27GB
24GB free, PID b128
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.1
Write 14.2
Mixed 8.5
18% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5600 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
181% Outstanding
MC Read 75.1
MC Write 70.3
MC Mixed 67.4
203% 70.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 54.7
SC Mixed 32
104% 36.3 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 181%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO Builds (Compare 3,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback