Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 266%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 359%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 132%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive584% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 01:31
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$499
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 246
2-Core 493
140% 275 Pts
4-Core 957
8-Core 1,883
168% 1,420 Pts
64-Core 4,513
279% 4,513 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 132%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E440) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 265
Parallax 537
210% 353 fps
MRender 445
Gravity 225
Splatting 357
280% 342 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 207%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3988 4545 4399 4494 2988 1534 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
584% Outstanding
Read 3,092
Write 3,885
Mixed 3,118
SusWrite 3658
778% 3,439 MB/s
4K Read 82.9
4K Write 354
4K Mixed 118
464% 185 MB/s
DQ Read 2422
DQ Write 1,914
DQ Mixed 2,149
1,613% 2,161 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 584%
Great: 595%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB
271GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 470 467 476 478 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 195
Mixed 385
SusWrite 472
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 46.7
176% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 278
227% 323 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 121%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
100GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 146 145 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 458
Mixed 380
SusWrite 179
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 50.8
189% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 175
178% 288 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
182GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 391 395 394 398 365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 360
Write 383
Mixed 355
SusWrite 389
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 47.2
166% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 228
171% 228 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 129%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
267GB free
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3580 3465 2203 1212 1186 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
476% Outstanding
Read 3,945
Write 2,867
Mixed 2,500
SusWrite 2,041
634% 2,838 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 216
4K Mixed 94.6
332% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 2,306
DQ Write 1,781
DQ Mixed 2,005
1,510% 2,031 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 476%
Great: 537%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
334GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1714 79 2769 3628 3064 914 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2,148
Write 2,410
Mixed 1,401
SusWrite 2028
450% 1,997 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 312
4K Mixed 95
300% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 2,331
DQ Write 1,992
DQ Mixed 1,985
1,536% 2,103 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 400%
Great: 486%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5600 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 76.3
MC Write 70.4
MC Mixed 67.9
204% 71.5 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 54.3
SC Mixed 32.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 182%
Great: 185%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO Builds (Compare 3,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback