Asus P6T DELUXE V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6T DELUXE V2  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081218
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 00:25
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 122
59% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 293
32% 250 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 67
Parallax 60.2
47% 61.6 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 52.9
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 171
Write 210
Mixed 174
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 20.5
73% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 77
DQ Mixed 36.3
32% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 104%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
80GB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.7
Write 80
Mixed 75
47% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.2
148% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 66%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.8
Write 155
Mixed 75.7
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
286% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 131 135 136 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
558GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 72.1
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 126 130 134 133 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 82 82 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
H/W RAID 5 16TB
981GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 160 165 174 170 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.2% Good
Read 171
Write 136
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 164
178% 136 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
44% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 190 11 60 29.8" 1920 1137 DEL4064 DELL U3011
Typical P6T DELUXE V2 Builds (Compare 1,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback