Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 22:55
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 72.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 920
89% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,047
65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050
MSI(1462 8126) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2377 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 83.8
Reflection 84.6
Parallax 79
68% 82.5 fps
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 64.1
59% 67 fps
Poor: 54% Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 296 212 314 327 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 487
Mixed 393
SusWrite 303
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 49
168% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 252
215% 316 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 106%
Great: 117%
PNY ELITE 480GB
19GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 38 36 36 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 69%
PNY ELITE 480GB
309GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 160 159 159 157 157 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 241
Write 102
Mixed 216
SusWrite 160
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 9.4
36% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 73.2
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 87.4
69% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
187GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 80 80 82 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 78.7
Write 81.1
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 79.6
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 62%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
36GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 99 99 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 71.5
Write 83.9
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 99.9
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
282GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 121 123 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 177
Write 150
Mixed 116
SusWrite 122
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.C1GQB.4032B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 27
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 26
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 64: 0P 5R 10G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
64% 24% 99 512 430 50 24" 1920 1009 ACR032E Acer V246HL
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II Builds (Compare 2,125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback