Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240422
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 21:01
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 210
2-Core 387
118% 226 Pts
4-Core 832
8-Core 1,625
146% 1,229 Pts
64-Core 1,899
118% 1,899 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.5% Very good
Lighting 89.2
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 83.1
73% 87.7 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 71.3
69% 87 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1561 933 67 265 139 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,632
Write 1,555
Mixed 1770
SusWrite 527
308% 1,371 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 59
203% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,568
DQ Write 1,840
DQ Mixed 1,603
1,236% 1,670 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 236%
Great: 365%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 217
Write 33.9
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 34.2
58% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
723GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 166 166 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 180
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 166
107% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.6
446% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
678GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 56 57 59 61 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5200 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
144% Outstanding
MC Read 52.1
MC Write 52.6
MC Mixed 51.3
149% 52 GB/s
SC Read 47.3
SC Write 48.4
SC Mixed 51.6
140% 49.1 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 131%
This bench: 144%
Great: 176%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 42% 12 216 57 70 27" 1280 720 SPT6B0B Sceptre Z27
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,212
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback