Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 274%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 238%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics307% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 18:06
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 85.6
1-Core 139
2-Core 281
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 809
85% 679 Pts
64-Core 861
53% 861 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
307% Outstanding
Lighting 439
Reflection 566
Parallax 790
357% 598 fps
MRender 521
Gravity 555
Splatting 300
360% 459 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 307%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,720
Write 1,904
Mixed 1,611
390% 1,745 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 55.1
193% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,451
DQ Write 1,043
DQ Mixed 1,243
930% 1,246 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
141GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 123 145 77 152 128 MB/s
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.9% Above average
Read 254
Write 256
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 131
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 16.1
79% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 5.4
67% 154 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 76%
Transcend SSD720 128GB
56GB free
Firmware: 5.2.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 118 119 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 380
Write 129
Mixed 182
SusWrite 118
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 35.1
126% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 139
112% 159 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 82%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
91GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 128 130 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 391
Write 147
Mixed 193
SusWrite 130
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 27.1
113% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 99.7
87% 130 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 80%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
119GB free
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 87 92 87 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 223
Write 123
Mixed 149
SusWrite 89.1
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 27.9
107% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 91.9
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 99.1
77% 104 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 64%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 22 60 27" 1280 720 SAM7079 LC27G5xT
Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $895
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback