Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 17:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 203
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 587
58% 475 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 24.3
16% 19.1 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 22
Splatting 13
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 143 155 156 153 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 912
Write 174
Mixed 291
SusWrite 159
83% 384 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.6
169% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 44.8
76% 144 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
350GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 119 118 114 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 116
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
242% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 25.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 16.8
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP002D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback