MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 12:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 82.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 340
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,024
105% 848 Pts
64-Core 1345
83% 1345 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 177
Parallax 179
146% 178 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 160
Splatting 132
130% 163 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 139%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MLD M300 NVMe SSD 1TB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMC0.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1614 105 101 96 95 224 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,112
Write 1,705
Mixed 1313
SusWrite 373
254% 1,125 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 78.1
270% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 1,017
717% 903 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 189%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 36.2
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 36.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 37 4 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7089 LC32G5xT
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback