To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221201
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 10:09
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 172
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 447
45% 364 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.6% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 38.6
31% 39.1 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 28
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E00100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 89 79 74 68 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 250
Write 213
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 90
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 16.7
79% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 94.4
99% 163 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
871GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 188 192 191 191 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 175
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 190
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V01L3LF8GB52852816 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 20% 5 193 11 100 21.5" 1536 801 ACR0D16 EK220Q E3
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback