Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory	55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '24 at 07:51
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Memory 66.7 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 147 54% 93.4 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 411 38% 316 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 19.6 Reflection 15.1 Parallax 26.5 16% 20.4 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 22.5 Splatting 15.2 13% 16.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2001T 1TB 11,283 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 814GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFMJ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 385 390 403 404 401 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 218 Write 104 Mixed 88 SusWrite 392 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 10.2 43% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 14.3 11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 105%
WD easystore 266A 5TB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4.5TB free, PID 266a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 32 32 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 54.5 Write 27.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 31.3 43% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1 71% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB 5,545 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.2% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 24.2 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 19.3 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	17.3"	1280 720	AUO429D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	246x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	211x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	144x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	135x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	267x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	111x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	20x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	90x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	84x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16