PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z840 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2129 |
Memory | 121.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20240104 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 27 '24 at 04:31 |
Run Duration | 231 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
72.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
98.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 347 351 352 352 352 MB/s
|
84.1%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
158GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 1067 1057 1066 1053 1050 MB/s
|
176%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue SN580 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1859 1830 1856 1853 1853 1857 MB/s
|
246%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST2000NM0018-2F3130 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EA04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 46 46 45 MB/s
|
67.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2K40CB1-CRC 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
123%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 61 | 50 | 60 | 24" | 1920 1017 | GSM56D9 W2442 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 132x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 117x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 101x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 150x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 103x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $95 |