Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H170M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '24 at 03:30
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 77.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 213 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 538 57% 455 Pts	64-Core 588 36% 588 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.2% Very good	Lighting 90.7 Reflection 151 Parallax 95.4 74% 112 fps	MRender 92 Gravity 90.9 Splatting 91.4 75% 91.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB 14,793 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 422 Write 223 Mixed 123 56% 256 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 19 108% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 25.4 47% 93.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 141GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 137 Write 138 Mixed 88.1 90% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion HDD 1TB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 377GB free Firmware: 1901 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 99.9 Write 121 Mixed 84.6 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.1% Good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 19 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	180	27"	1920 1080	ACR0BB6 QG271 S3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	170x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	168x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	47x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	16x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	27x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	22x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $408

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16