Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 00:29
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 231
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 542
64% 492 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2045 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.7% Poor
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 66.2
8% 48.9 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 65.5
46% 54.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-desire(p) 256G 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 637 228 270 269 243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,190
Write 1,007
Mixed 1,009
SusWrite 420
203% 906 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 49.3
160% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 500
368% 475 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 144%
Great: 239%
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
25GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 88 92 94 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 306
Write 93.5
Mixed 112
SusWrite 91.7
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 18.2
86% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 89.6
DQ Mixed 99.6
77% 105 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
132GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 70 72 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 73.7
Write 72.9
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 73.2
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
176GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 91 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 95.4
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 93.8
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.8
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 22.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 7% 30 215 58 200 23.6" 1280 720 SGT1342 E238FHD-G
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $409
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback