PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210709 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Apr 27 '24 at 00:29 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
85.4%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2045 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
20.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hs-ssd-desire(p) 256G 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 637 228 270 269 243 MB/s
|
144%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
25GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 88 92 94 92 MB/s
|
48.3%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
132GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 70 72 74 74 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
176GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 91 94 95 95 MB/s
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
76.1%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4% | 7% | 30 | 215 | 58 | 200 | 23.6" | 1280 720 | SGT1342 E238FHD-G |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 223x |
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 42x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 54x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 42x |
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples | 41x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $409 |