HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84DB
Memory	1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190221
Uptime	126.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '24 at 22:26
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 125 48% 82.4 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 377 35% 293 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.78 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 12.6 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 35.1 10% 26.1 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 45.4 Splatting 49.6 31% 35.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv128g TOSHIBA 128GB 3,266 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 12 11 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.4% Poor	Read 266 Write 44 Mixed 8 SusWrite 11.2 17% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 8.7 4K Mixed 11.5 32% 9.43 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 9.7 DQ Mixed 17.1 31% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 135%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 905GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 112 120 122 120 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 137 Write 141 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 119 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.3 96% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 11.2 37% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 94 43% 94 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	144	15.5"	1280 720	AUO82ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,779x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	941x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	1,165x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,132x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	520x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	333x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	233x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmv128gBench 91%, 3,266 samples	213x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	312x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	302x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	264x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16