RM DESKTOP 320

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	RM DESKTOP 320 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ77CP
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130226
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '24 at 16:07
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	53%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 70 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 125 53% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 226 28% 214 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 36.7 Parallax 34.6 27% 34.8 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 36.2 Splatting 24.8 25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Palit PSP120 SSD 120GB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM21.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 153 173 142 10 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 324 Write 228 Mixed 262 SusWrite 119 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 38.3 4K Mixed 15.3 64% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 135 116% 171 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 81%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 62GB free Firmware: 0002YXM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 76 77 77 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 72.6 Write 69.8 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 76.8 49% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GB 6,584 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.2 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	240	24.5"	1280 720	AOCB322 25G3ZM

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DESKTOP 320 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: RM DESKTOP 320

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	25x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	21x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	17x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG 2x8GBNanyaBench 46%, 332 samples	4x
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 0443 RMR1810KC58E8F1333 18GBHynixBench 47%, 4 samples	4x
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 57%, 1,052 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $482

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16