Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '24 at 13:26
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 123 2-Core 243 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 456 60% 451 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E270) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Lighting 38.2 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 47.5 31% 41.7 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 34.7 Splatting 27 25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 29%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Maxsun 128GB A6L 128GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW190712 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 320 Write 341 Mixed 322 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 12.3 100% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 21.7 74% 162 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 86%
Samsung PSSD T7 Shield 1TB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 580GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 38.6 Write 40.7 Mixed 38.9 9% 39.4 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 2.4 22% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KD48GU88J-26N190A 1x8GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 11.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 11.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 73.3 54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	55	60	32"	1280 720	XMD00E1 Mi TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	43x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $33Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	12x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $381

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16