Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-A  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190821
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 20 '19 at 03:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 193
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 525
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 1GB
CLim: 1385 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 17.1
16% 17.7 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 17.3
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxsun 128GB A6L 128GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0719A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 50 52 40 40 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 429
Write 389
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 90.6
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 7.8
39% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 81.6
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 0.5
60% 138 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
915GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 172 174 171 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 169
Mixed 103
SusWrite 172
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback