Biostar A78LR-M3S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A78LR-M3S  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 09:52
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 126
59% 94 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 263
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 20.5
16% 21.9 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 207 106 103 60 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 235
Write 111
Mixed 196
SusWrite 124
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 30.3
98% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 69.7
69% 109 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
125GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 45 36 48 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 102
Write 24.1
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 42.2
38% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 43%
Generic External 1TB
86GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 24 24 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 16.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 23.8
34% 21.2 MB/s
4K Write 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EEB8GB681CAE-16IC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 BNQ78B5 BenQ G2255A
Typical A78LR-M3S Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A78LR-M3S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $106
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback