Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 11 days ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA530
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190606
Uptime	12.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 26 '24 at 05:50
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 242 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 608 66% 522 Pts	64-Core 740 46% 740 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1A58 2004) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667 Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	65.8% Good	Lighting 81.8 Reflection 90.7 Parallax 77.3 67% 83.3 fps	MRender 93.8 Gravity 75.8 Splatting 69.6 64% 79.7 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB 13,215 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD7201Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 940 Write 1,109 Mixed 732 207% 927 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 80.3 4K Mixed 58 188% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 870 DQ Write 633 DQ Mixed 765 568% 756 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 700GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 120 120 119 120 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 97.4 Write 104 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 118 68% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.6 185% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.9% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 20.6 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 23.6 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	38	209	56	144	15.5"	1280 720	BOE0804

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,026x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	445x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	274x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	274x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	158x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	114x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	61x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	767x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	31x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2666 C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 81%, 6,948 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16