Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '24 at 18:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 212
2-Core 425
122% 239 Pts
4-Core 852
8-Core 1,521
143% 1,187 Pts
64-Core 2,536
157% 2,536 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 209
Parallax 203
181% 211 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 153
Splatting 135
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.23
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,050
Write 2,488
Mixed 1,831
476% 2,123 MB/s
4K Read 75
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 84.9
326% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 1,002
DQ Mixed 101
362% 805 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 483%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 3600 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 43.5
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 28.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 124%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 24" 1280 720 ACR069A Acer KG241 P
Typical GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 4,100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660 GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $511
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback