Asus H81M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-D  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '24 at 13:15
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 171
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 139
24% 170 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 32.2
26% 32.7 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC 128GB 128GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 158 167 173 171 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 449
Write 139
Mixed 168
SusWrite 166
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 14.5
87% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 80.5
82% 131 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
182GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 180 181 181 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 168
Mixed 78
SusWrite 179
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 104%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
413GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 200 199 202 203 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 206
Write 182
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 199
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 116%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1337 FLGF65F-D8 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 4R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 18% 34 195 56 60 23.5" 1920 1017 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical H81M-D Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback