Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 22:17
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 71
1-Core 162
2-Core 296
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 878
87% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 192
Parallax 180
160% 190 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 149
Splatting 133
124% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 138%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
510GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 434 434 463 450 448 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 468
Mixed 332
SusWrite 437
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 44.1
152% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 300
244% 346 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 110%
Great: 137%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
922GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2507 2611 1804 1766 1769 1757 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,641
Write 2,974
Mixed 2,798
SusWrite 2,036
590% 2,612 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 83
266% 88 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 846
620% 812 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 349%
Great: 526%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$198
890GB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 149 156 155 155 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 160 160 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 171
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 160
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 28.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 28.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 3R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 33% 18 215 58 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM778B LG ULTRAGEAR
History: Score 6: 0P 0R 0G 6B | Score 36: 0P 3R 4G 9B
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $747
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback