bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ77MK
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 18:53
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 377
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Intel(8086 2035) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 178 208 205 201 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 354
Write 259
Mixed 285
SusWrite 202
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 35.3
116% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 268
198% 263 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSK-D3D11M1600B-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 8% 50 42 35 30 27.9" 1280 720 PHL08F2 PHL 288P6L
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback