Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-600(DCH)
Memory23.7 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 18:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 696
74% 588 Pts
64-Core 689
43% 689 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDBRPG5000ANC-WR 500GB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1113 996 991 986 988 989 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,842
Write 2,069
Mixed 1,787
SusWrite 1,010
378% 1,677 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.2
181% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 741
DQ Mixed 919
672% 882 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 230%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 859B CT16G4DFRA266.M8FB 28GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 32 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback