MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7977
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977)  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 17:10
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 207
82% 140 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 518
55% 441 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 89.9
Parallax 60
42% 67.3 fps
MRender 68.9
Gravity 67
Splatting 60
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1376 1394 1424 1458 1454 1474 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,856
Write 1,798
Mixed 1,737
SusWrite 1,430
384% 1,705 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 61.3
193% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 522
DQ Mixed 706
514% 674 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 251%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
448GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 381 394 402 399 383 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 423
Mixed 399
SusWrite 388
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 43.4
149% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
316GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 413 426 421 417 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 434
Mixed 338
SusWrite 418
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 44.3
146% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
13GB free
Firmware: 1.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 344
Write 375
Mixed 267
73% 329 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 31.6
118% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 314
240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 26.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 23.6
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM705A LC32G7xT
Typical Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) Builds (Compare 4,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M5 (MS-7977) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback