Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z97X-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime11.6 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 01:07
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 187
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 275
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.3% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 60.4
48% 62 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 53.7
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1030 2TB SSD
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS103F00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 556 586 582 578 570 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 548
Write 560
Mixed 550
SusWrite 550
125% 552 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 44.9
147% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 774
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 666
469% 602 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 127%
Great: 308%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 530309WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 371 381 374 376 365 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 337
Mixed 358
SusWrite 358
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 40.2
131% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 118
148% 262 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 123%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
375GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14,457
Mixed 69.1
5,192% 7,263 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 57%
WD Elements 1TB
434GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 50.4
Write 36.9
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 37.1
50% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AO2L16BC8R2-BTES 1315 CT102464BD186D.M16 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 TCL0000 32S321
Typical GA-Z97X-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback