Acer Aspire A3SP14-31PT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A3SP14-31PT  (all builds)
MotherboardADN Halzan_ADN
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 15:38
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-N305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 44.7
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 165
51% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 663
59% 498 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 165C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 8.8
6% 9.43 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ128HCHQ-00BTW 128GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 996
Write 929
Mixed 759
199% 895 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 40.8
126% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 691
511% 679 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 153%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 28.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 42 60 14" 1536 889 BOE0AE8
Typical Aspire A3SP14-31PT Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A3SP14-31PT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback