Sony SVF15319SN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony SVF15319SN  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 14:47
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Memory 42.7
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 112
42% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 163
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sony(104D 90BE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 4.8
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EVM25/128GB 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 357 216 71 70 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 389
Write 350
Mixed 351
SusWrite 189
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 17.4
78% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 39.2
80% 159 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 90%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
772GB free
Firmware: JA0OA5G0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,091
Write 0.2
Mixed 2.5
737% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 379
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.6
15,991% 127 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15C0
Typical SVF15319SN Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony SVF15319SN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback