MSI MS-16Q3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star P65 Creator 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16Q3  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180918
Uptime11 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 13:24
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 177
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 429
47% 370 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
MSI(1462 1244) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.2% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 47
Parallax 36.2
34% 41.7 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 39
Splatting 38.5
32% 38.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 36%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1244) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10
7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ 512GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 563
Write 511
Mixed 407
110% 494 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 24.2
86% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 747
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 509
413% 590 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 148%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
129GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 998 738 664 583 514 497 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,991
Write 1,779
Mixed 1,493
SusWrite 666
331% 1,482 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 51.9
166% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 733
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 605
455% 614 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 200%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 17.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC107 PHL 246E7
Typical MS-16Q3 Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16Q3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback