HP EliteBook x360 830 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook x360 830 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8847
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 12:41
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 216
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 397
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 8847) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 20.6
12% 18.3 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.2
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Thnsn51t02duk TOSHIBA 1TB
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KHA4102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 701
Write 654
Mixed 630
148% 662 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 35.3
122% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 317
250% 357 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 179%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4AAG165WA-BCWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 17.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 14.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 116 56 60 13.2" 1280 720 AUO6B8B
Typical EliteBook x360 830 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook x360 830 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback