TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 11:18
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 173
2-Core 344
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1064
108% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,219
75% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 404C)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 233
Reflection 213
Parallax 213
190% 220 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 155
Splatting 137
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 156%
 Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM620 1TB
603GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2290 2213 2188 1202 287 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 1,876
Write 2,482
Mixed 1,733
SusWrite 1,411
423% 1,876 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 73.7
240% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,479
DQ Write 1,112
DQ Mixed 551
614% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 170% ↑
This bench: 294%
 Great: 348%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
611GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 176 181 181 178 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 162
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 175
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 98.9%
 Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 34.3
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 31.9
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 37.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 93.7%
 Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 75 24.5" 1280 720 IVM6133 PL2530H
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B550M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 3,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD  $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples974x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples532x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD  $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples382x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples342x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples304x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples295x
SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples120x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples90x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples73x
RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples123x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples99x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback