MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics378% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D68
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)  (all builds)
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 10:28
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$545
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 98.1
1-Core 204
2-Core 411
126% 238 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,619
144% 1,220 Pts
64-Core 3,207
198% 3,207 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 126%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Nvidia(10DE 16F4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3375 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
378% Outstanding
Lighting 609
Reflection 541
Parallax 727
496% 626 fps
MRender 479
Gravity 556
Splatting 296
349% 444 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 378%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,441
Write 1,864
Mixed 3,377
574% 2,560 MB/s
4K Read 73.1
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 101
327% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 2,121
DQ Write 1,859
DQ Mixed 2,031
1,511% 2,004 MB/s
Poor: 268% Great: 635%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
897GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 550
Write 622
Mixed 550
129% 574 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 35.3
116% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 330
248% 330 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX CMP64GX5M2B6000Z30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
266% Outstanding
MC Read 165
MC Write 57.5
MC Mixed 78.8
287% 100 GB/s
SC Read 61.5
SC Write 73.3
SC Mixed 68
193% 67.6 GB/s
Latency 38.7
104% 38.7 ns
Poor: 153%
This bench: 266%
Great: 292%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 49 540 24.1" 1280 720 AUS24B5 ROG PG248QP
Typical MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68) Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $2,358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback