HP Pavilion TS 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion TS 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2169
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170314
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 02:04
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4555M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 43.6
1-Core 23
2-Core 44.3
25% 37 Pts
4-Core 66.7
8-Core 67.5
9% 67.1 Pts
64-Core 67.2
4% 67.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600G
HP(103C 2169) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 3.8
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 164 166 163 154 151 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 156
Write 130
Mixed 119
SusWrite 158
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 15.9
49% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 56.8
33% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.8
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 116 78 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO103C
Typical Pavilion TS 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion TS 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback