Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 00:48
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 175
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 550
54% 442 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 67.1
55% 69.6 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 66.9
55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJPR7001TB 1TB
576GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A7T25A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1624 1730 1734 1735 1677 1714 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,219
Write 1,820
Mixed 1,477
SusWrite 1,702
405% 1,805 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 50.2
162% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 575
430% 578 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 269%
Great: 362%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
368GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 431 429 430 424 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 469
Mixed 224
SusWrite 430
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 44.2
146% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 214
199% 307 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 119%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
287GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 462 467 467 464 447 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 471
Mixed 442
SusWrite 461
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 46.6
154% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE601 10TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: LHGL0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 205 204 212 214 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 214
Mixed 87
SusWrite 206
130% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1.1
321% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 119%
Great: 132%
WD WD80EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 162 163 164 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 27.9
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 20.5
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 0R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 200 41 30 36.1" 1280 720 MTC0000 100012585
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback